This contribution analyzes the recent and increasing use by the Court of the institution of the manifestly well-founded appeal, governed by Article 132 RP Trib. To this end, the cases in which this instrument has been applied and its differences with respect to other similar procedural instruments are examined. The work, taking in particular consideration some orders issued by the Court during 2024, highlights, on the one hand, the criteria applied by judges to declare an appeal manifestly well-founded and, on the other hand, reflects on the legal implications of the instrument.
