This paper analyses the decision No. 181/2024 of the ICC. Taking into consideration the constitutional case-law concerning double preliminarity subsequent to decision No. 269/2017, the A. places the judgement at issue between two jurisprudencial approaches of the ICC. While arguing that the centralized judicial review of legislation must be emphasized in the constitutional case-law as a «foundation of the constitutional architecture» and as a vehicle of the European integration process, this paper tries to reason about the potential issues of the decision No. 181/2024 to argue that they are, overall, overcomeable.
